Specs:
- Tuner: ATSC/NTSC/QAM
- Resolution: 1920 x 1080
- Refresh Rate: 120Hz
- Contrast Ratio: 3,000,000:1 Dynamic
- Response Time: 4ms
- Inputs:
- 4x HDMI
- 1x Component
- 1x VGA
|
Frontpage Deal
Samsung UN55B6000 55" 1080p 120 Hz LED HDTV $1600Specs:
Original Post
Samsung UN55B6000 55-Inch 1080p 120 Hz LED HDTV $1599.99 free shipping from Amazon.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos...v= glance Product Features Ultra-slim 55-inch LED HDTV with full HD 1080p resolution for the sharpest picture possible LED technology enables a true-to-life range of picture brightness; uses 40 percent less energy than conventional LCD TVs InfoLink RSS feeds of news, weather and sports from your broadband connection Inputs: 4 HDMI, 1 component, 2 USB, 1 Ethernet, 1 PC, 1 optical digital audio output Includes detachable swivel table stand; measures 51.5 x 34.4 x 12 inches (WxHxD) with stand
Wiki Community Board
This can and should be used by you to post updated deal information. Be sure to read this because it may contain answers to your questions!
Google Prices : http://www.google.com/products/ca...ps-sellers
From CNET: [cnet.com] Product summary The good: Produces relatively deep black levels; accurate color; very good dejudder processing; sleek styling with 1.2-inch thick panel; extensive picture controls; extremely energy-efficient. The bad: Expensive; less-uniform screen than other LCDs; poor off-angle viewing; backlight fluctuates with program brightness; dark areas tinged bluer; shiny screen can cause reflections in bright rooms; red frame isn't for everyone. The bottom line: Although it delivers fine picture quality, except for a few flaws, the ultrathin Samsung UNB6000 series will appeal mainly to style seekers who don't mind spending more money.
View Forum Thread
209 Comments |
|
ALMOST there... Waiting for the $1500 mark.
ALMOST there... Waiting for the $1500 mark.
I'd figure I can stack BING CB...
Hmmm I got a LN55B640 sitting at BB that I paid $1274 + tax.....3 years interest free.........debating on if I should do this deal instead????
.
.
.
.
.
.